ASSISTED REPRODUCTION IN THE LIGHT OF CHRISTIANITY AND ISLAM. DIALOGUE AND / OR CONFRONTATION?
Keywords:
assisted reproduction, Christianity, Islam, anthropology, family, marriage, infe1tilityAbstract
The aim of the development of science and technology that we have been witnessing in the past decades, is not only to improve the quality of life, but life itself. New reproductive technologies are presented as something in service of improving life, but it turns out that this development is beginning to re-conceptualize the basic concepts of identity, gender roles, kinship, social equality and existing cultural, religious and ethical norms. The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the development of scholarly debates about the relationship of new reproductive technologies, seen as modem achievements which strongly influence the life of a man, and religion, as something of a more traditional network of conceptions and ethos that a man uses to leam about himself and the world around him. The paper analyzes the religious views of Christianity and Islam on the homologous (medica) procedures that use sex cells of reproductively-challenged spouses) or heterologous (medica! methods which include donation of sperm and/or eggs) assisted reproduction, with the aim of finding the opportunity for dialogue and/or place of confrontation in applying new reproductive procedures and traditional religious conceptions, in cases when "natura)" procreation is not possible and infertility is a highly undesirable...
References
Almeling, R. (2007) Selling Genes, Selling Gender: Egg Agencies, Sperm Banks, and the Medica! Market in Genetic Material.American Sociological Review vol. 72 no. 3: 319-340.
Delaney, C.1986. The Meaning of Paternity and the Virgin Birth Debate.Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 21(3): 494-513.
Devedžić, M. (2004) Razvoj reprogenetike i njeni demografski
aspekti. Stanovništvo 1-4:45-65.
Draškić, M. Biomedicinski potpomognuta oplodnja. http://www.ius.bg.ac.rs/prot7Materijali/dramar/bmpo.medicinsk o%20pravo.pdf, 2014.
Drezgić, R. Nove reproduktivne tehnologije i reproduktivna
autonomija, http://www.uzbuna.org/yu/node/l 35/reprodukcija vi%C5%A1kavi%C5%A 1ak-reprodukcije-rocl-u-ekonomskom smislu/neoliberalizam-i-rnaterinstvo-4, 2013.
Dutney, A (2007) Religion, infertility and assistedreproductive
technology. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology 21(1): 169-180.
Evans, J. H. i Hudson,K. (2007) Religion and Reproductive Genetics: Beyond Views of Embrionic Life. Jurna/ for the Scientific Study of Religion 46: 565-581
Fathalla, M. F. (200I) Current challenges in assisted reproduction. Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction: report of a WHO meeting, ed. Vayena,E., Rowe,
P. J. i Griffin, P. D. Geneva.
Grebeldinger, J. (2013) Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Reviewing Recent Perspectives and Addressing Research Gaps in Medica! Anthropology.
I O. lnhorn, M. C. i Birenbaum-Carmeli,D. (2008) Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Culture Change. Annu. Rev. Anthropol.. 37: 177-96.
Inhorn, M. C. (2006) Making Muslim Babies: IVF And Gamete Donation In Sunni Versus Shi'a Islam. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry (30): 427-450
Jovanović, N. (2014) Islam i sa vremeni svet- Religijske zabrane:primeri i prakse u svakodnevnom životu. Religija i tolerancija Vol. XII, no.21: 150-180.
Lepetić, T. (2014) Nove reprodukktivne tehnologije-novi oblici moći nad tetom Antropologija 14: 97-113
Mitrović,V. (2012) Liberalna eugenika: ideologija poboljšanja?
Antropologija 12 (2): 63-97
Pišev, M. (2012) "Zovite ih po očevima njihovima": muška sterilnost i nove reproduktivne tehnologije u svetlu Islama. Antropologija 12 (2): 155-167.
Schenker,J. G. (2005) Assisted reproductive practice: religious perspectives. Reproductive BioMedicine IO (3): 310-319.
Schenker, J.G. (2000) Women's reproductive health:monotheistic religious perspectives.Jnternational Journal ofGynecology & Obstetrics 70: 77-86.
Serour,G. I. 2001.Attitudes and cultural perspectives on infertility and its alleviation in the Middle East area. Report of a WHO meeting, ed. , ed. Vayena,E., Rowe, P. J. i Griffin, P. D. Geneva.
Sharp, L. A. (2000) The Commodification of the Body and its
Parts.Annual Review of Anthropology 29: 287-328.
Vukomanović, M. (2012) ,,Religija pred izazovima mnogostruke modernosti", Religija i tolerancija 10 (17): 47-62
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.